Nachhilfe in Vertrauen: Trusted Computing

Aufklärung in
9/11 und neue Weltordnung:
... das gesunde Nachhilfe- und Unterrichtsmaterial ;-)
Stichwort 9/11, Twin Towers und die augenscheinlichen Hintergründe.

Nimm Dir ein wenig Zeit und setz Dich hin ...

>> link to VIDEO / Loose Change

Louder Than Words
... unbedingt ansehen und weitergeben ...

>> LINK ZUM VIDEO (25 Mins)

& more:

>> http://www.letsroll911.org/
und
>> diese Bilder sollen angeblich das Pentagon-Flugzeug beweisen,
tut mir leid, ... aber je mehr solche Bilder ich sehe, desto unglaubwürdiger wird mir die offizielle Version.

Anregung:
ist das nicht sinnvolles und gutes Unterrichtsmaterial
für Englisch-Nachhilfe bei älternen Schülern oder Erwachsenen ?! ;-)

Danke für den Hinweis: >> Denklicht.de

<< zurück

more Information:

>> Zitat von Question911.com

"

World Trade Center Towers
Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel.
Footage shows explosives were placed in both towers before the attack to cause the towers to disintegrate into dust.
The towers fell exactly into their footprint, taking the path of most resistance in about 10 seconds, the same amount of time it takes an object to fall that distance in a vacuum.
The towers tossed massive steel beams 200 feet in each direction, too far to be explained by a gravity collapse.
Survivors and firefighters report explosions at the BASE of the WTC towers at the same time as the planes hit it - how did Osama do this?
Pools of molten metal were found 7 stories under the towers 6 weeks after the attack. It takes 5000+ degrees Fahrenheit to turn steel into liquid. Where did this energy come from?
The top of the south tower began to collapse sideways, then righted itself, falling into it's footprint. This is impossible with only gravity working to collapse the tower.
Building 7
It was a 47 story, steel-framed building that disintegrated later in the day, also from explosives. It was not hit by any planes. How did Osama pull this one off?
The 23rd floor was the Mayor’s "Emergency Command Center," a reinforced bunker which had its own air and water supply. Could this have been the command center for destroying the towers?
Pentagon
How does a 65 ton Boeing 767 with a 125 foot wingspan fit through a single 16 foot hole in the side of the Pentagon leaving virtually no wreckage?
There is no evidence of a Boeing 767, seats, wings, engines, luggage or the dead passengers at the Pentagon.
The Pentagon security video suggests a missile explosion rather than a jet fuel explosion.
The Planes
The planes that hit the WTC towers, from viewing the footage in slow motion, do not appear to be standard passenger jets.
What is the explosive flash on the side of the towers just before the planes penetrate the buildings?
With Flight 93, the reported flight of the "Lets Roll" hero's, wreckage was strewn 8 miles from the crash sight when this plane was reported to be "ditched" in Pennsylvania. How is that possible?
At least 8 of the reported 19 "hijackers" are still alive, as reported by the UK Guardian Newspaper.
There are no Arab names on ANY of the passenger lists for the 4 hijacked flights.
There is no video showing the "hijackers" boarding any of the planes, only fuzzy security footage from Logan Airport for a connecting flight.
Cellular phone calls are nearly impossible in flight above 8000 feet as cell phones have low power and cell towers point downwards.
A physics professor at Brigham Young University has published a paper concluding that available evidence indicates that the World Trade Center towers were demolished by explosives. 60 of his fellow professors agree with his analysis and are simply calling for more investigation, as we are. Is that too much to ask?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Christopher Bollyn, of the American Free Press, writes:
The Soviet-style secrecy surrounding Sept. 11 has succeeded in keeping the American public in the dark ....
Painful Questions presents compelling evidence that the attacks were “a scam of immense proportions.”

Great documentary on contemporary history, 13 September 2005
Author: hvera from United States

»A most satisfying documentary. Whether one agrees or not with the main argument of the filmmakers or not, there is much to learn from the well documented facts assembled here. This is the best true documentary I have seen in a long time. I particularly enjoyed its sense of humor and the clips from feature films such as Ali Baba and the 40 thieves. The film does only ring true; if one is alive, one has been a witness to much of what the film assembles to make its points. Notwithstanding, be prepared to be surprised by the bold argument the film makes. This is a very fair-minded presentation of one key aspect of our contemporary history.«